Bucks ML -120…3rd game in 4 days for 6-23 Pacers all losses…now faces rested Bucks team…seems worth the gamble to go against a short handed tired team that’s lost 7 of 9 and you don’t have to worry about a point spread

Bost Bruins -120

I know Bost not playing well and Mont is prob better team right now but best team doesn’t always win looks like we have Fowler and Swayman in goal tonite and this is more of a play on Swayman than anything because he is 10-1-1 with 2.66 GAA vs Mont so I think Bost steps up tonite and beats Mont

Alright, guys, I think I hit the end of the road on this forum. It's a shame because there are a lot of decent people who come on this forum to share their picks. And as I said in an earlier post this year, I also think Freak has become a minor legend in this field of sports forums on the internet. But, what I will not tolerate is a moderator who thinks that their ego & position is more important that sports betters who visit this website making money. I hate to brag, but I'm just laying out the FACTS. I think I have offered up plays on this forum to the tune of over 70% winning wagers over the course of the last 2 years. Please show me any Sports Service who can come anywhere near making that factual claim. NONE can claim they have even come close. So, instead of being grateful that there is a professional better who chooses to share their picks for free on the forum, a moderator wants to show their power by hassling me over a wager that I put up for free and bet 10 dimes on my self. Does that make any sense to anyone but him? Anyhow, you can look at yesterday's thread and draw your own conclusions. So, to all the people who made a few bucks off my posts, sorry, but this is how any reasonable person would feel. Best of Luck to you all.

NCAAB

UCF -7 ( UCF is 8-1 at home and faces an FAU squad that has struggled to shoot effectively on the road.

I think that anyone who goes back and reads the thread would see that I DID provide a reason for my pick (as I always have). Comparing your power rating to the odds-makers and trusting your numbers are stronger than theirs is a valid reason (which I gave). Odds'makers who put out a number have to consider 2 things, not 1. First what is the right number in fact, but secondly what the right number that the PUBLIC perceives it should be, in order to not get one-sided action on a game. That's where I have a massive EDGE. I only have to consider the first statement. I don't see what was so hard to understand concerning this concept. Did the moderator want me to make up a reason that was NOT the real reason I was betting on that team. Was my reason not sufficient in his eyes? If that's the case, he shouldn't be moderating a sports forum. Especially when he is representing someone (Freak) who has an outstanding reputation in this industry. And incidentally, Rider covered not only the 32.5, but even when the number steamed down to 30 = You still were a WINNER!

I'm going to take a break for a while and think things over. Thanks to all for the compliments & I wish everyone a very happy & prosperous New Year!!